When comparing Superdesk vs Flextype, the Slant community recommends Flextype for most people. In the question“What are the best open source headless CMS's?” Flextype is ranked 2nd while Superdesk is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Flextype is:
Define unlimited custom fields for any of your entries.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Visual
The interface is clean and well designed. You can tell someone with a UX background worked on it and not just software engineers.
Pro Easy to use
Putting together an article is straightforward: you type the text into the main fields and then use drag and drop to add photos.
Pro Publish to more than one website
You have the option of setting up publishing routes to choose where something gets published in case you have multiple websites.
Pro Customizable
I like that you can set up a personal workspace and also add different widgets to your dashboard depending on what you’re interested in.
Pro Newsroom automation
Superdesk can aggregate and automate multiple mundane newsroom jobs.
Pro Dynamic Content Types
Define unlimited custom fields for any of your entries.
Pro Free
MIT-licensed open source project and completely free to use.
Pro No external DB required
Pro Built-in REST API
Provides APIs organized around Representational State Transfer (REST) for working with content.
Pro Version Control
It is easy to version control all content in Flextype with GIT or any other Version Control System.
Pro Flexible
Simple but powerful Core API's.
Pro Super Fast
Elegance architecture and built-in smart cache.
Pro Tokenized API
Cons
Con Sometimes buggy
Sometimes, when trying to publish a post I was getting errors which was a bit annoying. However, after we updated to the latest version the instance was running smoothly.
Con Not one-click publishing
At least in our company’s system you need to do a couple of extra steps to publish an article.
Con Same CMS repackaged
Same CMS that got regurgitated over and over for years.