When comparing put.io vs WebTorrent Desktop, the Slant community recommends WebTorrent Desktop for most people. In the question“What are the best Torrent clients?” WebTorrent Desktop is ranked 5th while put.io is ranked 18th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Can automatically start downloading content once it's available
Broadcatching is a method of automatically downloading content as soon as it's available. Broadcatching in BitTorrent clients is usually implemented via RSS.
Pro Popular torrents are instantly available
Due to server side caching popular torrents can be downloaded quickly.
Don't need to have a machine running to download.
Pro Beautiful interface
Pro Streaming supported
Before the torrent is complete, you can stream the video and audio. It even supports seeking - it prioritizes the current location instead of always going in sequential order.
You can also stream to Chromecast, DLNA, and AirPlay.
Pro Open Source
The developers have their files stored on GitHub.
Pro Support webrtc peers
It supports webrtc peers which increases the swarm to allow for websites to stream.
Pro Insanely fast
Download multiple torrents simultaneously, efficiently and fast
Pro Comprehensive test suite
runs completely offline, so it's reliable and fast
Pro Supports advanced torrent client features
- magnet uri support via ut_metadata
- peer discovery via dht, tracker, and ut_pex
- protocol extension api for adding new extensions
Pro Exposes files as streams
Fetches pieces from the network on-demand so seeking is supported (even before torrent is finished)
Seamlessly switches between sequential and rarest-first piece selection strategy
Con Unknown underlying technology
It is unclear what BitTorrent protocol features or extensions are supported by the service.
Con Not free
Plans start at $9.99/mo.
Con Missing some more advanced controls
For those who like fine-tuning something simple into something crazy.