When comparing OsmAnd Maps & Navigation vs Maverick Pro, the Slant community recommends OsmAnd Maps & Navigation for most people. In the question“What are the best Android offline map apps for outdoors/hiking?” OsmAnd Maps & Navigation is ranked 1st while Maverick Pro is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose OsmAnd Maps & Navigation is:
[OSM] provides a map editable by everyone; just like the web-based encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Using a community edited map allows one to correct isses they encounter. Combined with the monthly turn around, these edits are added for navigation quickly. : http://www.openstreetmap.org/
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Based around crowdsourced OpenStreetMap data
OSM provides a map editable by everyone; just like the web-based encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Using a community edited map allows one to correct isses they encounter. Combined with the monthly turn around, these edits are added for navigation quickly.
Pro Works offline once the maps are downloaded
Pro Routinely updated maps
Utilizing the community driven OpenStreetMap data has allowed for monthly publishing of new maps that the user can use. Though that doesn't necessarily mean the map data has changed.
Pro Excellent general map viewing
Sometimes one needs more than just navigation, they have a need to view a map or specify a specific route. OsmAnd provides a very nice, detailed map. This can be good for seeing what is around you or showing a place you are talking about to a friend.
It also provides a means to add waypoints on the map which can be used to dictate a specific route (not simple enough to do routinely).
Pro Contour lines enable understanding the terrain
Through the use of an additional plugin OsmAnd Maps & Navigation is able to utilize contour lines on its maps which helps view the landscape and terrain.
Pro Helpful lane guidance
Lane guidance can assist in deciding if one should stay in the right or left lanes. OsmAnd provides detailed information on the number of lanes and which are valid for your chosen destination; based on the data available it may show too many or too few lanes.
Pro OpenStreetMap contributing made convenient
One can also utilize features to contribute back to OSM. This includes reporting a bug or adding a POI. This feature doesn't require an internet connection as the points can be uploaded latter upon request.
Pro Shows speed limit
Pro Free and open source
Pro Save placemarks
Can save placemarks of different types under different lists and hide or show each list. Can be exported to KML files for use in Google Earth, etc.
Pro Records tracks
Records a track of where you've been and shows it on the map. You can hover over the track to see distance and time at each point. Tracks can be exported for import into other software.
Pro Many map types supported
OSM, MapQuest, satellite images, Hike & Bike, etc.
Pro Can use Google Maps
Officially removed at request of Google, but can still be used by manually editing the map sources files.
Pro Offline maps
Offline maps using "folders of PNG files" or sqlite database.
Con Poor navigation interface
The interface is not the most intuitive, though is continually progressing. It doesn't provide a 3D view like many navigation apps.
Con Slow rendering
It can take some time for an area to be rendered. This tends not to be a problem during navigation since only a small area must be rendered as the map moves, and this area isn't immediately needed; though likely a bigger issue with smaller screens.
Con No display when the next speed limit occurs
When driving on unknown streets you are often surprised by speed limits or town signs, so you have to friction brake.
Con Slow and sometimes poor search
Most often does not find what you are looking for (which is not caused by bad OSM data).
Con Terrible address data
This is a limitation of OSM's data, but it is unreliable for locating an address while offline. Even with internet it doesn't appear that it can locate most addresses.
Con Near impossible to scroll through map
Due to the slow rendering (already mentioned) it is near impossible to scroll through OsmAnd's maps. You move the map only slightly and it takes ages to redraw all vector layers.
Con Being based on OpenStreetMap data can be lacking
The use of OSM also has the drawback of many places not getting the attention needed for updates. Depending on the geographic location OSM may have the most detailed maps or the most bare/outdated map.
Con No longer actively developed
Last updated 2017-02, reviews on Google Play show developer no longer responds to contacts and bugs are increasing as new phones become incompatible with its features.
Con No navigation
This app only displays map images. It has no concept of road paths, etc. and therefore is incapable of navigating them. It can show a target location with a straight line leading to it, though, and you could conceivably load a track into it to follow, but you'd have to generate the track elsewhere.
Con No support for vector maps
Raster maps are necessary for satellite imagery, etc. but take up a lot more space than vector maps.
Con Default map format is unwieldy
Saving thousands of small PNG files is wasteful of SD storage (slack space) and makes it very slow to migrate from one phone to another or backup phone, etc.