When comparing SYSmark 2018 vs Super PI, the Slant community recommends Super PI for most people. In the question“What are the best tools for benchmarking a Windows PC?” Super PI is ranked 5th while SYSmark 2018 is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Super PI is:
The SuperPi tests are quite accurate and even the slightest adjustments to your pc (clockspeeds, attached USB-devices...) can influence test results. This makes Super Pi very suitable for overclockers.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Includes all the apps Chrome, Office, etc. Real World and not synthetic benchmark
Pro Extremely accurate tests
The SuperPi tests are quite accurate and even the slightest adjustments to your pc (clockspeeds, attached USB-devices...) can influence test results. This makes Super Pi very suitable for overclockers.
Pro Calculates different increments of pi
You can adjust the settings of Super PI to only calculate Pi up to a certain amount of decimals. For example, you can use a test for 512.000 digits for a quick reference, while a calculation of 32 million digits will be longer and more thorough.
Pro Very fast
Although speeds depend on your processor, Super PI is generally a fast benchmark solution. Calculating one million digits of pi will only take a couple of seconds.
Cons
Con Only tests a single CPU-thread
Super PI is a single threaded program, which means it's only capable of benchmarking a single thread of your CPU. Current CPU's generally have four threads or more. The testing method of Super PI isn't optimized for modern CPU's and this measure is quickly becoming less and less important.
Con Credibility concerns for online results
Super PI has quite a competitive nature, with people attempting to reach the quickest scores in order to get a record. There have been fraudulent results in the past and with a bit of tinkering, it's possible to produce inaccurate time results.