Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing XAJA vs Cycle.js, the Slant community recommends Cycle.js for most people. In the question“What are the best client-side JavaScript MV* frameworks?” Cycle.js is ranked 11th while XAJA is ranked 20th.
Specs
No specs yet!
GZipped size21.1 kB
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
No other questions
Pros
Pro Simplicity
Uses almost plain HTML & JavaScript
Pro Built in support of .NET
Altough it is primarilly client-side framework, it has native support of .NET server objects. Due to simple and documented communication protocol could be easily connected to other server technologies.
Pro Not opinionated
Pro All behaviour is declared in a pure main function
Pro Functional approach
Pro Virtual DOM rendering
Pro Conceptually fascinating
A perpetual motion machine that works.
Pro Supports JSX, React Native…
Pro Server-side rendering
Cons
Con Not very popular
XAJA is not a very popular framework, making it hard to find learning resources, tutorials and guides outside the official documentation.