When comparing Lightroom vs Pixlr Editor, the Slant community recommends Pixlr Editor for most people. In the question“What are the best online photo editing sites?” Pixlr Editor is ranked 3rd while Lightroom is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Pixlr Editor is:
Can be used to directly edit images right from Google Drive after installing its [Chrome App](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/pixlr-editor/icmaknaampgiegkcjlimdiidlhopknpk).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent asset management capabilities
Lightroom allows, for example, organizing images based on folders, color labels, flags, rating, keywords, GPS location, it can automatically create smart albums (albums that automatically update based on set rules) and it can be set to automatically backup, rename based on set rules, apply default processing, add keywords to images on import. It offers that functionality in an intuitive way and allows extensively customizing layout, behavior and workflow of managing assets to better suit your needs.
Pro HDR support
Can merge multiple shots into one in order to expand dynamic range.
Pro Facial recognition helps find and tag people
Lightroom has built-in facial recognition support that can be used to find the same person in any collection of photographs.
Pro A good number of cameras have built-in lens profiles for lens distortion correction
Lightroom has over 900 lens profiles from all kinds of manufacturers, including major lens brands like Canon, Nikon, Leica, Pentax, Ricoh, etc. You can see the full list of supported lenses here. Lens profiles will in most cases speed up the process of correcting lens distortion down to 1-2 clicks.
Pro Intuitive interface that's streamlined for a photographer's workflow
At a high level the interface is organized into broad groups of tools called workflow modules. Modules like "Library" for asset management and "Develop" for manipulating the photos. Each module displays only those tools that are needed for that task. This allows you to separate concerns between tasks and reduces interface clutter. When you're, for example, developing the image, you're not bothered by interface tools relating to exporting it.
Within each module tools are grouped in a logical manner. Develop module, for example, will group tools relating to basic image adjustment, lens correction, and effects.
And there are a plethora of keyboard shortcuts that improve the workflow speed even further. At all times you can easily navigate between images you're working via arrow keys, quickly compare images before and after making edits with \
, or see side by side comparisons with y
.
Pro Supports tethered capture
You can connect your camera directly to Lightroom and have Lightroom display images as soon as they are captured.
Pro Works with Google Drive
Can be used to directly edit images right from Google Drive after installing its Chrome App.
Pro Can save to cloud or download
Pro Has a Chrome App
Pro Can zoom using mouse wheel
Pro Has advanced filters
Pro Has most Photoshop filters
Cons
Con No layer-based image editing capabilities
There are no layers removing any ability to blend images, create composits, overlay text, etc.
Con Hot folder option could be better
It can take a couple of seconds for Lightroom to check the folder for incoming images and that can noticeably slow down the workflow. Additionally, only the last image is imported as active.
Con There's a learning curve
Con Telemetry
Adobe is interested in what you do with "their" software. Just install wireshark and see the story unfold. Don't have that or too difficult? Just take a bank note, scan it. See if you can get it on your screen...
Con Expensive and subscription
As with other software offerings, Adobes portfolio keeps giving. For the customer/ user however, this means that you never own your software, but you rent it. Until the point your landlord throws you out.
Con Proprietary
As all Adobe software it is proprietary, closed source.
Con Requires Flash
Con Ads
There are ads on the main page of the site, making for a less than stellar fit on screen. This can of course be countered by using an ad blocker in ones browser, though this does not work when using the Chrome Web Store app (which is the same as the site) as adblocker's do not work on Chrome Webstore apps.
Con Some known bugs
- If you save and the name you give has system weird characters like :, <, >... it'll simply refuse to save and do nothing (you'll have to give a name without those characters first).
- Saving to cloud is broken in many cases
- Merge down layer with mask changes actual rendering (workaround: first apply layer mask)
- ...
Con Lacks drag and drop support
Doesn't yet support dragging & droping images in to the browser window.