Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Logseq vs Trilium Notes, the Slant community recommends Logseq for most people. In the question“What are the best note taking apps for Linux?” Logseq is ranked 15th while Trilium Notes is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose Logseq is:
Logseq is opensource.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Open source
Logseq is opensource.
Pro Privacy-first
Logseq is a privacy-first tool for thought.
Pro Org syntax
Logseq support Emacs Org syntax out of the box.
Pro Networked notes
Similar to Roam's technique of letting the notes flow with links to each other.
Pro Excellent WYSIWYG interface
Pro Free and open source software
Pro Database storage rather than files
This enables the tool to do a lot of things that would be difficult with plain text file storage.
Pro Note encryption
Pro Note versioning
Pro Synchronization with a server
You can set up synchronization but you need a server to do this.
Pro Graph of node connectivity
Pro Attributes that can be assigned to nodes and inherited
Pro Archival functionality
Cons
Con Still in Alpha
Logseq is still in Alpha and is under heavy development.
Con Database storage rather than files
This makes it a little less simple to work with (also has benefits).
Con Interface can be confusing
There is a fair amount of flexibility to the interface but it can also become confusing, especially when some parts are not necessarily simple to use. Most of the basic features nevertheless are intuitive.
Con Not markdown
It will import and export markdown but it does not store content as markdown. This isn't necessarily a problem if you don't need it.
Con Synchronization requires use of Trilium's sync server
This can be problematic to set up unless you have a web server that will support the requirements of this.
Built By the Slant team
Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices.
Try it now - it's free