Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing fancyBox 2 vs fancyBox 3, the Slant community recommends fancyBox 3 for most people. In the question“What are the best browser image gallery libraries?” fancyBox 3 is ranked 3rd while fancyBox 2 is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose fancyBox 3 is:
You can display other things beside images in fancyBox's dialogs.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Accepts multiple media types
Fancybox accepts many media types including:
- Ajax
- Iframe
- Inline HTML
- SWF
Pro Can be instantiated in multiple ways
You can create a new fancy box in many ways, making it flexible to how your site is built.
You can provide it with a jQuery object, a href and title object, a string, or an array of objects or strings.
Pro Responsive
Responsiveness helps it work well for small screens and phones.
However, the responsiveness is implemented using javascript resize events instead of being a CSS only solution.
Pro A lot more than an image gallery
You can display other things beside images in fancyBox's dialogs.
Pro Responsive
The dialog responsivity is even better than the version 2.
Pro Can be instantiated in multiple ways
The same way version 2 was.
Pro Better than fancyBox 2
This version is lighter, easier to use and a lot more beautifull, stable and fast.
Pro Fast
Ultra fast rendering speed.
Pro Modern
Beautifull design.
Cons
Con Has a jQuery dependency
Con Deprecated
fancyBox has a new version, and the version 2 is no longer supported.
Con Has a jQuery dependency
