When comparing Webflow vs Claris FileMaker, the Slant community recommends Webflow for most people. In the question“What are the best No-Code Development Platforms?” Webflow is ranked 1st while Claris FileMaker is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose Webflow is:
Speed & Quality webdesign done in your browser.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Best in it's class
Speed & Quality webdesign done in your browser.
Pro Semi-collaborative development support
Webflow allows workload to be shared among multiple users. However, you can't leave comments for them.
Pro W3C-compliant HTML5/CSS3
Webflow generates W3C-compliant markup and stylesheets.
Pro Responsive web design with Bootstrap
Because it's based on Bootstrap, it works across all modern browsers & devices.
Pro Rapid deployment
Can use built-in templates or add-ons to deploy your solution quickly.
Pro Large support community
Pro Low code
The platform is low code and for non-developers to use.
Pro Compatible for small or large apps
Pro Integrations with other platforms is simple
Straightforward and simple to integrate FileMaker with other platforms.
Pro Owned by Apple
A stable, reliable, and trustworthy platform owned by Apple.
Pro Easily customizable and flexible
Easy to customize for business needs.
Pro Hosting and sharing is simple
Cons
Con Based on Bootstrap
Bootstrap is rather old technology
Con Design tool is web-based, not a proper application.
The site doesn't state this explicitly.
Con Can't export your site for deployment unless you pay.
Not unreasonable, but something users should know before investing their time.
Con Uses JavaScript
Webflow uses JavaScript on its websites. Website visitors can have JavaScript disabled and be unwilling to enable it for the website they want to view, which would put a website created with Webflow out of their reach.
Con No way to collaborate on designs with comments
Forum post here.
Con No version control
Forum post here.
Con Fixed media queries
Webflow has four fixed breakpoints (desktop, laptop, mobile landscape & mobile portrait). The inability to set your own media queries can be limiting. If your layout breaks outside of these four options, you have to export the code and write them yourself.
Con Outdated look and feel
Con Will need to invest some time into learning the basics
Have to spend some time to get to know the database design and scripting, slightly longer learning curve with FileMaker than with other similar platforms.
Con Not executable
Requires software install and maintain on all clients.
Con Licensing can be a barrier to entry
Licensing can be expensive.