When comparing CanvasJS Charts vs Webix, the Slant community recommends Webix for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript charting libraries? ” Webix is ranked 10th while CanvasJS Charts is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Webix is:
Webix is one of the most extensive UI component libraries, second only to Sencha ExtJS. Not only considering the number of widgets, but also the API methods for manipulating these widgets.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Works across devices and browsers
Charts can render across devices including iPhone, iPad, Android, Windows Phone, Desktops, etc.
Pro High performance
Charts can render tens of thousands of data points without any performance issues.
Pro Free for non-commercial use (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License)
Pro Start-up friendly
Offers discounted pricing for start-ups and new companies.
Pro Good commercial pricing
A single developer license for CanvasJS costs $299.
Pro Supports 24 different chart types
Supports 24 different chart types including line, column, bar, spline, area, pie, doughnut, stock charts, etc.
Pro A lot of widgets
Webix is one of the most extensive UI component libraries, second only to Sencha ExtJS. Not only considering the number of widgets, but also the API methods for manipulating these widgets.
Pro Views can be constructed using JavaScript without HTML
The most common way of working with webix is to create a JSON configuration of your view in JavaScript. When you use TypeScript, you get complete typechecking and intellisense in your IDE.
Pro Seems to be quite stable
Even the most complicated GUIs are bug-free most of the time.
Pro Webix Jet
The webix Jet library adds all the required features for SPA development (routing, template loading, ...)
Pro Extremely simple to implement.
To get started is extremely simple. It has a low learning curve.
Pro Mature project
Regular updates and releases.
Pro Great support from the webix team
The company behind webix is really quick in answering any questions you have on their forum or via email.
Pro Awesome responsive material skins
Great design and icons pack.
Cons
Con No drill-down
There is no drill-down possibilities built in.
Con Non-interactive
Charts lack interactivity features.
Con Cost for commercial use
Con Commercial license
It's not free for commercial applications.
Con Not very popular
Not really a reason to not recommend it. But it has still a small user base. It deserves a lot more attention.
Con Not modular
The library is not modular (except for some additional more complex widgets). If you only need a few widgets, you still need to include the entire library.
