When comparing CanvasJS Charts vs Pixi.js, the Slant community recommends CanvasJS Charts for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for creating visualisations of data as charts/graphs?” CanvasJS Charts is ranked 5th while Pixi.js is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose CanvasJS Charts is:
Charts can render across devices including iPhone, iPad, Android, Windows Phone, Desktops, etc.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Works across devices and browsers
Charts can render across devices including iPhone, iPad, Android, Windows Phone, Desktops, etc.
Pro High performance
Charts can render tens of thousands of data points without any performance issues.
Pro Free for non-commercial use (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License)
Pro Start-up friendly
Offers discounted pricing for start-ups and new companies.
Pro Good commercial pricing
A single developer license for CanvasJS costs $299.
Pro Supports 24 different chart types
Supports 24 different chart types including line, column, bar, spline, area, pie, doughnut, stock charts, etc.
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Cons
Con No drill-down
There is no drill-down possibilities built in.
Con Non-interactive
Charts lack interactivity features.
Con Cost for commercial use
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.