Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing AnyChart vs Webix, the Slant community recommends AnyChart for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript charting libraries? ” AnyChart is ranked 5th while Webix is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose AnyChart is:
xml, json, csv, js api.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro A lot of different data formats
xml, json, csv, js api.
Pro Lots of chart types
Including bar, line, area, scatter, waterfall, spline, funnel, bubble, polar, column, columnrange, pie, box plot, angular gauge, areasplinerange, and other types of "basic" charts (AnyChart); Gantt charts (AnyGantt); Maps (AnyMap), and Financial/Stock charts (AnyStock).
Pro Independent from other js libraries
no jQuery or libraries.
Pro IE6+ support, along with mobile browsers
Pro Experienced team and long product history
AnyChart is on the market since 2003.
Pro Events support
Pro Flexibility
Any part of chart can be adjusted.
Pro A lot of integration templates
Technical integration templates for many popular stacks.
Pro A lot of widgets
Webix is one of the most extensive UI component libraries, second only to Sencha ExtJS. Not only considering the number of widgets, but also the API methods for manipulating these widgets.
Pro Views can be constructed using JavaScript without HTML
The most common way of working with webix is to create a JSON configuration of your view in JavaScript. When you use TypeScript, you get complete typechecking and intellisense in your IDE.
Pro Seems to be quite stable
Even the most complicated GUIs are bug-free most of the time.
Pro Webix Jet
The webix Jet library adds all the required features for SPA development (routing, template loading, ...)
Pro Extremely simple to implement.
To get started is extremely simple. It has a low learning curve.
Pro Mature project
Regular updates and releases.
Pro Great support from the webix team
The company behind webix is really quick in answering any questions you have on their forum or via email.
Pro Awesome responsive material skins
Great design and icons pack.
Cons
Con Proprietary
Con Expensive
Once you use it on anything but a site, it rapidly gets expensive.
Con Commercial license
It's not free for commercial applications.
Con Not very popular
Not really a reason to not recommend it. But it has still a small user base. It deserves a lot more attention.
Con Not modular
The library is not modular (except for some additional more complex widgets). If you only need a few widgets, you still need to include the entire library.
