Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Qbs vs Waf, the Slant community recommends Waf for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source build systems for C/C++?” Waf is ranked 10th while Qbs is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose Waf is:
You don't have to learn a domain specific syntax. If you know Python, it's a breeze.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Pros
Pro Declarative paradigm like js
Pro Well-defined language
Pro Supports all kinds of toolchains, even for exotic bare-metal architectures
Pro Cross platform
Pro Very well-written documentation
Pro Excellent dependency tracking
Pro Powerful and easy-to-learn concepts
Pro Written in Python
You don't have to learn a domain specific syntax. If you know Python, it's a breeze.
Pro File changes are tracked based on a hash of their changes not the time stamp
This means that switching branches in git isn't a big deal.
Pro Very fast
Much faster than its predecessor SCons.