When comparing Fluent Search vs Copernic Desktop Search, the Slant community recommends Fluent Search for most people. In the question“What are the best desktop search tools for Windows?” Fluent Search is ranked 8th while Copernic Desktop Search is ranked 16th. The most important reason people chose Fluent Search is:
Most things can be tweaked, including the interface, the default search engines, the prioritization of search results, the search tags, and more.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Customizable
Most things can be tweaked, including the interface, the default search engines, the prioritization of search results, the search tags, and more.
Pro Modern
The developer works for Microsoft and is already developing with an eye toward Windows 11 (while maintaining functionality under Windows 10)
Pro Powerful filename search
It has a built-in indexer, but can also use others (including Everything)
Pro Active development
The developer is very responsive to the community, and releases new versions on a regular basis
Pro Free
There are no ads, and no paid version
Pro Plugin system
Users can develop their own plugins to extend the functionality
Pro Even includes Outlook .PST files
Reliably indexes and searches huge Outlook message stores (10GB or more). You can then filter by to/from, folder, content string, etc.
Pro Searches content, not just names
Cons
Con No result ranking
Despite allegedly being on the cusp of offering a ranking of the search result (since v.4.0), as of 7.0 this fundamental feature is still lacking.
Con Annual subscription
Since the launch of its 7.0 version, you now have to buy an annual subscription to use the software.