When comparing Flussonic Media Server vs Lightstream, the Slant community recommends Lightstream for most people. In the question“What are the best software tools for live streaming?” Lightstream is ranked 8th while Flussonic Media Server is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Lightstream is:
Go live in under 60 seconds.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use and configure
Easy to integrate with other Flussonic servers. Development doesn't stop. They keep updating their software and enhancing the experience and the capabilities.
Pro Easy to use / quick setup
Go live in under 60 seconds.
Pro Browser-based
No downloads necessary, go live from your browser.
Pro Remote guests
Add guests to your stream with the click of a link.
Pro Live chat support
Help is always there if you need it.
Cons
Con Sometimes updates break the config file and sometimes things are changed drastically
This may prompt you to redo and reconsider your setup. It's not recommended to update Flussonic unless you have time and make sure the server you're updating is not serving customers.
Con Sound issues
There can be constant crackling noises during Facebook live sessions through Lightstream.
Con Apps missing
Con Recommended ~5MB upload
Some may not have internet speeds that are fast enough for Lightstream.
Con No longer FREE
Lightstream offers a 1-week free trial only.