When comparing Flussonic Media Server vs ShadowPlay, the Slant community recommends ShadowPlay for most people. In the question“What are the best software tools for live streaming?” ShadowPlay is ranked 5th while Flussonic Media Server is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose ShadowPlay is:
If you want to record 1080p 60fps, this will get you there. If you were having performance issues using CPU encoding before, Shadowplay will most likely work 10x better that you swear that it doesn't appear to be recording at all.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use and configure
Easy to integrate with other Flussonic servers. Development doesn't stop. They keep updating their software and enhancing the experience and the capabilities.
Pro GPU accelerated encoding
If you want to record 1080p 60fps, this will get you there. If you were having performance issues using CPU encoding before, Shadowplay will most likely work 10x better that you swear that it doesn't appear to be recording at all.
Pro Allow recording video after the fact
ShadowPlay can set up a recording buffer and only save to a local file if needed.
Cons
Con Sometimes updates break the config file and sometimes things are changed drastically
This may prompt you to redo and reconsider your setup. It's not recommended to update Flussonic unless you have time and make sure the server you're updating is not serving customers.
Con Nvidia cards only
Only works with Nvidia cards, so those with AMD cards will not be able to use this app.