When comparing GNU Make vs Gatsby JS, the Slant community recommends Gatsby JS for most people. In the question“What are the best static site generators?” Gatsby JS is ranked 12th while GNU Make is ranked 17th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro No need for wrapper modules
Other build tools need wrapper modules to do certain tasks. The biggest disadvantage of these wrapper modules is that they bind you to a version of that tool. With Make you don't have that problem, there's no need for wrappers and no tools to bind you to a version, you can use any version of Make that you want.
Pro Uses the full power of the UNIX shell
Make takes advantage of the powerful UNIX shell, using it at it's full potential. STDIN and STDOUT are especially useful because of their versatility.
Pro Works with more than just node.js
Since it's written in C and can be found in all UNIX-based systems it can be used on platforms other than node.js.
Pro No page reload when navigating
Pro Live reload
Every change you make can be almost immediately seen in a browser.
Pro Based on React.js
Editing markup is phenomenally easy when you have components.
Pro Beautiful out-of-the-box blog starters
Con Doesn't run on Windows by default
Make requires Cygwin/msys2/MinGW to run on Windows.
Con A bit raw
You'll maybe have to tweak some JSX if you want something that's not covered by available themes.