When comparing foot vs Tilda, the Slant community recommends Tilda for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux terminal emulators for low-resource machines?” Tilda is ranked 11th while foot is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Tilda is:
There are tons of customizations you can make: from adding colors to text, turning backgrounds transparent, setting the size to be "maximized", toggling scrollbar on and off, adjusting orientation/borders/animation, etc.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro On-the-fly font resize
Pro IME (via text-input-v3)
Pro On-the-fly DPI font size adjustment
Pro DE agnostic
Pro Server/daemon mode
Pro True Color (24bpp)
Pro Lightweight, in dependencies, on-disk and in-memory
Pro Synchronized Updates support
Pro Keyboard driven URL detection
Pro Sixel image support
Pro Color emoji support
Pro Multi-seat
Pro Wayland native
Pro Fast
Pro User configurable font fallback
Pro Scrollback search
Pro Highly customizable
There are tons of customizations you can make: from adding colors to text, turning backgrounds transparent, setting the size to be "maximized", toggling scrollbar on and off, adjusting orientation/borders/animation, etc.
Pro Easily accessible drop-down
The drop-down function in Tilda does not get in the way and can be accessed at any time with a keyboard shortcut.
Pro Few dependencies
Tilda is a very minimal and lean terminal emulator. It requires very few dependencies and the amount of resources needed is small.
Pro Supports transparency
You can monitor information displayed by applications under Tilda.
Pro Tabs support
Tilda supports tabs. By default: to open a new tab press Ctrl + Shift + t. To move through them: Ctrl + PgUp/PgDn.
Cons
Con Contains some annoying bugs
Tilda can be buggy at times. For example, if you don't close it before shutdown, it may prompt you to reconfigure it all over again on the next boot.