Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Upload vs JPEG Mini - Compressor, the Slant community recommends Upload for most people. In the question“What are the best cloud-based image processing services?” Upload is ranked 9th while JPEG Mini - Compressor is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Upload is:
Upload.js installed into our web app in a few seconds. It's a lightweight library, so there's no UI elements. A "file input element" was already present on our page, and with Upload.js you set their helper method as the "onchange" attribute, and they take care of everything else from there.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Took a few seconds to setup
Upload.js installed into our web app in a few seconds. It's a lightweight library, so there's no UI elements. A "file input element" was already present on our page, and with Upload.js you set their helper method as the "onchange" attribute, and they take care of everything else from there.
Pro Image resizing & cropping
Used their AI image cropping for some projects (you don't define crop geometry yourself -- they detect which part to crop for you), and manual cropping for others (where the user wanted to set which part of the image to crop in the UI). We're currently saving all our images out to webp.
Pro Very cost-effective
Time savings aside, it's very cost-effective. Entry tier for like $7pm worked well for several client projects. Only upgraded to the $35pm tier because a client wanted password-protected files -- other than that, the quotas / limits are very generous.
Pro Quality
Even though the file size is reduced heavily, the quality of the image is retained
Pro Time
It applies the compression real quick
Pro File size
Reduces file sizes of JPEG up to 6 times based on the dimension of the image
Cons
Con License
It is not open source
