When comparing Flurry vs Matomo (previously Piwik), the Slant community recommends Matomo (previously Piwik) for most people. In the question“What are the best cross-platform mobile analytics tools?” Matomo (previously Piwik) is ranked 7th while Flurry is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Matomo (previously Piwik) is:
There are no restrictions, pricing tiers, or risks of the service being killed off, because you can run it on your own hardware.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Built-in installation tracking
Pro Able to be self-hosted
There are no restrictions, pricing tiers, or risks of the service being killed off, because you can run it on your own hardware.
Pro Free / Libre software
Cons
Con Unable to report on captured events
You can send them events but reporting on the events in aggregate is so painful that I'd call it impossible.
Con Lacks an external API
No API for sending information from a mobile application / web backend to analytics.
Con Subpar funnel functionality
User segmentation is limited to 10 segments and creating new segments takes a day. Any funnel calculations take a day. Certain steps can't have conditions applied to them.
Con Real-time data is not instant
Unlike many competing products, Flurry updates data every few minutes instead of every few seconds.