When comparing Gitter.im vs Contus Fly, the Slant community recommends Gitter.im for most people. In the question“What is the best team chat software?” Gitter.im is ranked 11th while Contus Fly is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Gitter.im is:
Integrations for Trello, Jenkins, Travis CI, Heroku, Sentry, BitBucket, HuBoard, Logentries, Pagerduty & Sprintly are available.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Has many developer-friendly integrations
Integrations for Trello, Jenkins, Travis CI, Heroku, Sentry, BitBucket, HuBoard, Logentries, Pagerduty & Sprintly are available.
Pro Unlimited public and private rooms for free
Pro Has full Markdown support
Pro Has an IRC bridge
Pro Has apps for OSX, iOS and Chrome
Pro Has a Windows 8 app
Unofficial app for Gitter.im is currently available.
Pro Open source
Pro Scalability
Contus Fly has quick scalability applications from few users to lakhs of users. It performs simultaneously to communicate with the user with online presence.
Pro On Cloud
Host data on a cloud server or on your own premises servers to scale up your instant messaging mobile app's accessibility and scalability.
Pro High Profile Technology Stack
Build your chat app with solution powered by Ejabbered, Erlang, Amazon Web Services, MySQL, and much more under the hood.
Pro Customization
Hyper-accommodative for quick customizations, scalability, technology updates and integrations.
Cons
Con Centralized
Con Apps / UX limited in functionality and can be buggy
Con Group video conferencing
Communicating with a group using video calls on the chat app is an extra feature. You need an upgrade in group video conferencing.