When comparing Jitsi vs Alpemix, the Slant community recommends Jitsi for most people. In the question“What are the best ways to share your screen with others?” Jitsi is ranked 8th while Alpemix is ranked 16th. The most important reason people chose Jitsi is:
Project available on github for anyone to contribute to or use.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Open-source
Project available on github for anyone to contribute to or use.
Pro Cross platform
Mac, Windows & Linux availability.
Pro Video calls
Pro OMEMO encryption without plugin
Secure Jabber Texting, better than legacy sms texting.
Pro Supports SIP accounts
well implemented SIP SIMPLE (texting), SIP presence, XCAP.
Pro Supports XEP-0016 and privacy Lists
Jabber Texting apps without Privacy Lists are WOEFULLY deficient.
Pro Encryption out of the box
Encryption for chat, desktop sharing, and web confrencing available.
Pro Fast
No difference with others
Pro Cheap
Maybe the chippest comparing to others
Pro Multiplatform
Works on Windows, Linux, OS X, iOS and Android. Works crossplatform very well.
Pro Great support
Very quick email support returns. Less than 1 hour.
Pro Safe
For key transfers, 1024 bit RSA and 256 bit RSA are used. The key that is encoded with 1024 bit RSA can be sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is not sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is sent again after being encoded with 256 bit AES.
Pro Easy Setup - No Installation
Download the client from http://www.alpemix.com/site/Alpemix.exe and run only 1 click
Pro Free for personal use
Its free for limited individual usage.
Pro Always Online Remote Desktop ( Service )
You can install Alpemix service for your computer to be able to connect it with only password 24/7.
Pro Multiple remote sessions
you can connect multiple desktops simultaneously.
Pro File sharing
You can share everyting crossplatform
Pro Reliable
Alpemix runs since 2010 to nowaday with %99 uptime.
Pro Good security
For key transfers, 1024 bit RSA and 256 bit RSA are used. The key that is encoded with 1024 bit RSA can be sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is not sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is sent again after being encoded with 256 bit AES.
Cons
Con Crashes on MacOS Monterey
Con Abandoned Android development
They switched focus to Jitsi Meet client for Android.
Con Uses Java
Not a native app, takes awhile to load.
Con Gui not as slick or streamlined as competitors
