Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Final Cut Pro X vs XMedia Recode, the Slant community recommends Final Cut Pro X for most people. In the question“What are the best video encoding tools?” Final Cut Pro X is ranked 5th while XMedia Recode is ranked 7th.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro GPU utilization
Pro Powerful media organization
Pro Resolution independence
Pro Real-time graphics and effects
Pro 64-bit architecture
Pro Native format support
Pro Full high-quality pro-res support
Pro Integration with Motion
Pro Multicam editing
Pro ColorSync-managed color pipeline
Pro Filters
Crop, resolution, denoise, blur, sharpness, rotate, smart blur, etc.
loudness normalization, volume correction, etc.
Pro Bitrate control modes
VBR, 2-pass VBR, CQP, ICQ/LA-ICQ, etc.
Pro Hardware acceleration
Intel Quick Sync, NVENC/cuda, AMD.
Pro Many codec types
H264, HEVC, VP9, AV1, etc.
AAC, HE-AAC, HE-AAC V2, opus, vorbis, flac, ape, etc.
Cons
Con You need lots of plugins
For example tracking is something Final Cut can't do. Only with a plugin which costs (example) around 100$.
As well as for advanced colour correction you have get a third-party plugin.
Con Important compatibility and format issues
Breaks compatibility with previous versions of FCP and does not support industry standards such as EDL, OMF, AAF. You can export to their version of XML and use third-party tools for a workaround (with limited success).
Con Works only on OS X
Con Color grading is unfamiliar and nonprofessional
Especially compared to Premiere's Lumetri Color Panel in 2015 cc.
