When comparing Rio Terminal vs FireCMD, the Slant community recommends FireCMD for most people. In the question“What are the best terminal emulators for Windows?” FireCMD is ranked 21st while Rio Terminal is ranked 28th. The most important reason people chose FireCMD is:
FireCMD supports command auto-completion. Once you start typing a command, you can press the `tab` key to auto-complete it.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Best minimal tabs
They are as minimal as they can be. You don't need info on tabs, they are just tabs, which shell or where you are doesn't give you any context, so why show this info?
Pro Sophisticated auto-completion
FireCMD supports command auto-completion. Once you start typing a command, you can press the tab
key to auto-complete it.
Pro Recursive and persistent aliases
FireCMD allows users to create up to 500 aliases.
Pro HTML and CSS support makes for greater usability
HTML is a very flexible and user-friendly language for writing web pages, while CSS allows for the content of a HTML document to be separated from the style and layout of that document.
Pro A free trial is available
A free trial of FireCMD is available for users to try out.
Cons
Con Can't choose font weight of a custom font yet
Con Not free
Although there's a free trial available, FireCDM is not free and costs $29.