Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Beego vs Iris, the Slant community recommends Beego for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Beego is ranked 18th while Iris is ranked 56th. The most important reason people chose Beego is:
Beego is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro No need to find and install external libraries
Beego is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete.
Pro Built-in tool which watches for changes
Beego has a built-in tool which watches the code for changes. This tool (called bee tool) can be configured to run any task once the code changes. It can run tests or reload and rebuild the whole project.
Pro Built in ORM
Beego's eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. Beego examples and documentation all use the beego ORM. No need to learn to use and integrate another ORMs API.
Pro Captcha
Pro Auto testing
Pro No need to find and install external libraries
Iris is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete.
Pro Efficiency
Efficiency by using a light engine.
Pro Development
Pro API
If you're familiar with expressjs or other modern web frameworks, Iris will make you feel at home.
Pro More than feature complete
Pro More than 250 examples
More than 250 examples for implementing web application.
Pro Low amount of bugs
Most issues are questions, few bug reports and if a bug is found it's quickly patched.
Pro Good for big projects
Iris is a good framework for big projects and the author helps solving problems.
Cons
Con Very opinionated
Con Very opinionated
Con Non-idiomatic code
Con Builds may fail silently
Sometimes even though a build has failed, the pages will still render. Apparently it caches a previous build when the current one has a problem. This can be a frustrating though because it leaves you wondering why the page you are working on stopped working out of the blue.
Con Previously experience with net/http
Previously experience with the Go's standard net/http package is necessary for you to move forward with Iris.
Con Author copies code
