When comparing Beego vs Rocket, the Slant community recommends Rocket for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Rocket is ranked 14th while Beego is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Rocket is:
Rocket makes extensive use of Rust's code generation tools to provide a clean API.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro No need to find and install external libraries
Beego is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete.
Pro Built-in tool which watches for changes
Beego has a built-in tool which watches the code for changes. This tool (called bee tool) can be configured to run any task once the code changes. It can run tests or reload and rebuild the whole project.
Pro Built in ORM
Beego's eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. Beego examples and documentation all use the beego ORM. No need to learn to use and integrate another ORMs API.
Pro Captcha
Pro Auto testing
Pro Easy To Use
Rocket makes extensive use of Rust's code generation tools to provide a clean API.
Pro Streams
Rocket streams all incoming and outgoing data, so size isn't a concern.
Pro Cookies
View, add, or remove cookies, with or without encryption, without hassle.
Pro Testing Library
Unit test your applications with ease using the built-in testing library.
Pro Extensible
Easily create your own primitives that any Rocket application can use.
Pro Templating
Rocket makes rendering templates a breeze with built-in templating support.
Pro Query Strings
Handling query strings and parameters is type-safe and easy in Rocket.
Pro Type Safe
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something.
Pro Boilerplate Free
Spend your time writing code that really matters, and let Rocket generate the rest.
Pro Config Environments
Configure your application your way for development, staging, and production.
Cons
Con Very opinionated
Con Very opinionated
Con Non-idiomatic code
Con Builds may fail silently
Sometimes even though a build has failed, the pages will still render. Apparently it caches a previous build when the current one has a problem. This can be a frustrating though because it leaves you wondering why the page you are working on stopped working out of the blue.
Con Abandoned
Con Nightly
Uses only nightly versions of Rust.