When comparing Mango vs Web.go, the Slant community recommends Web.go for most people. In the question“What are the best web frameworks for Go?” Web.go is ranked 17th while Mango is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose Web.go is:
Web.go is a minimalistic web framework which adds routing to the `net/http` package from the standard library. Even so, web.go tries to compensate for the small abstraction that it offers by structuring routes in a tree instead of a list. As such, it's a very fast framework which makes it a good choice in applications where good performance is key.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Modular
Mango is very modular. You get to choose which libraries to include in your project.
Pro High performance
Web.go is a minimalistic web framework which adds routing to the net/http
package from the standard library. Even so, web.go tries to compensate for the small abstraction that it offers by structuring routes in a tree instead of a list. As such, it's a very fast framework which makes it a good choice in applications where good performance is key.
Cons
Con Abandoned
Last commit on Github was on 2013.
Con Doesn't add a lot of functionality on top of the standard library
Most of the tasks that web.go is used for can be completed with standard library support without adding the overhead of an additional external library and without having the risk of web.co development being abandoned one day.