Tigertonic vs Beego
When comparing Tigertonic vs Beego, the Slant community recommends Beego for most people. In the question“What are the best web frameworks for Go?” Beego is ranked 4th while Tigertonic is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose Beego is:
Beego is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Good for building REST APIs
Tigertonic is a pretty minimalistic framework. Only the most essential features and libraries are included. Making it a great framework for developing high-performance REST APIs.
Pro No need to find and install external libraries
Beego is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete.
Pro Built-in tool which watches for changes
Beego has a built-in tool which watches the code for changes. This tool (called bee tool) can be configured to run any task once the code changes. It can run tests or reload and rebuild the whole project.
Pro Built in ORM
Beego's eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. Beego examples and documentation all use the beego ORM. No need to learn to use and integrate another ORMs API.
Pro Captcha
Pro Auto testing
Cons
Con Might not be suitable for large backend applications
Tigertonic is great for building a REST API for the backend if you want to develop a SPA using a frontend framework for example. But for anything that requires more features on the server side, it would be better to use a more "batteries included" framework.
Con Very opinionated
Con Very opinionated
Con Non-idiomatic code
Con Builds may fail silently
Sometimes even though a build has failed, the pages will still render. Apparently it caches a previous build when the current one has a problem. This can be a frustrating though because it leaves you wondering why the page you are working on stopped working out of the blue.