When comparing iOctocat vs Working Copy, the Slant community recommends Working Copy for most people. In the question“What are the best GitHub clients for iOS?” Working Copy is ranked 1st while iOctocat is ranked 2nd. The most important reason people chose Working Copy is:
Works with any Git remote, not just GitHub. Clones to device letting you work offline and push when convenient. Extends your other applications with iOS 8 app extensions.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Repository overview is perfect for small screens
Repository overview is perfect for mobile phones and for what iOctocat is built for, easy access on the go for repos. It displays the description, a quick way to open detailed info and a quick way for bookmarking for later.
Pro Fully fleshed out issue management
iOctocat is at feature parity with github.com when it comes to managing issues. You can view & open all open/closed issues, search issues, filter issues, open new issues, edit old issues including all the meta data and comment on issues.
Pro Not just GitHub, works offline
Works with any Git remote, not just GitHub.
Clones to device letting you work offline and push when convenient.
Extends your other applications with iOS 8 app extensions.
Pro Allows other apps to access files
Working copy integrates with other apps to allow them to access and edit files through iOS8 document picker.
Pro Clean UI
Pro Frequent updates by the developer
Supports latest iOS features.
Con Some features are not supported for free
For some features, users need to buy the basic or pro version of iOctocat which come as in-app purchases.
Private repositories and notifications require the Basic update. Receiving push notifications and support for GitHub enterprise require the Pro upgrade.
Con Pushing to remote servers is not free
Working copy is free to download but requires a small in-app purchase to be able to support pushing to a remote server.