When comparing Material Design Icons by Google vs IcoFont, the Slant community recommends Material Design Icons by Google for most people. In the question“What are the best icon web fonts?” Material Design Icons by Google is ranked 2nd while IcoFont is ranked 6th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Designed under Material Design guidelineskkkk
Pro Open source
The icons are open source and free to use.
Pro Hosted by Google Web Fonts
As with any font hosted by Google Web Fonts, it's simple to use. Self-hosting is available, or you can include a single line of HTML.
Pro Fast
Light weighted.
Pro 2105 free customisable Icons
2105 free Icons separated by categories.
You can get the entire collection in a single package or choose only the categories you need.
Pro Simply the Best
Icofont is sincerely the best collection of free icon fonts out there. The icons are clear-cut, with clean shapes and just the right amount of design on each and most importantly, balanced with just the right default sizes. Better than Fontawesome by far. The only downside is that the last update was in 2018.
Cons
Con Some icons look ugly
Con Small set of icons
This font contains rather small set of icons that are targeted to be used in context of mobile device.
Con Currently in Beta
Could be a con, could not be one.
Alternative Products
