Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Material Design Icons by Google vs Friconix, the Slant community recommends Material Design Icons by Google for most people. In the question“What are the best icon web fonts?” Material Design Icons by Google is ranked 2nd while Friconix is ranked 3rd.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Designed under Material Design guidelineskkkk
Pro Open source
The icons are open source and free to use.
Pro Hosted by Google Web Fonts
As with any font hosted by Google Web Fonts, it's simple to use. Self-hosting is available, or you can include a single line of HTML.
Pro Fast
Light weighted.
Pro Large variety of icons
Pro Icons are nice
Pro Uniform style
Pro Customize your JS file
You can customize a JS file with only the icons you selected. Awesome, optimized and very fast !
Pro Add new icons on request
The Friconix guys add new icons when you request them. They are very reactive.
Pro Icons are free
Pro Font icons are homogeneous
Pro Very fast to load
You can create your custom small icon file.
Pro Documentation is clear
Documentation about icons is clear and easy to understand.
Cons
Con Some icons look ugly
Con Small set of icons
This font contains rather small set of icons that are targeted to be used in context of mobile device.
Con Add link
When using icons in a paid application, a link to the Friconix website must be added.
