When comparing antiX vs Pear OS, the Slant community recommends Pear OS for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for KDE without systemd?” Pear OS is ranked 12th while antiX is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose Pear OS is:
For anyone stuck between moving from MS to Apple a for people hat do not want the locked down nature of either, Pear OS gave you the freedom of Linux with the elegance of Apple.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Extremely lightweight
Has a 70-90MB memory footprint.
Pro Quick installation
The installation procedure for antiX is quick and painless. It installs the OS and grub in no time.
Pro Works well on 32-bit PC
Fewer distros are available to work on 32-bit machines. This works well on old Toshiba. Quick enough on older machines not to notice any lagging.
Pro Stats appear on the desktop
Pro Works very well on ASUS 1005HA netbook
Faster than other distros tested, including many on this list.
Pro Beautiful
For anyone stuck between moving from MS to Apple a for people hat do not want the locked down nature of either, Pear OS gave you the freedom of Linux with the elegance of Apple.
Pro Similliar
It looks like Apples MacOS.
Cons
Con Not really free and not available for download in Iran
Con Different Icons
There is no 1/1 icons in the latest version of it, but its not a problem as modders can change it to apples icons.
