antiX vs ArchLinux32
When comparing antiX vs ArchLinux32, the Slant community recommends antiX for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distros for old notebooks/laptops?” antiX is ranked 1st while ArchLinux32 is ranked 21st. The most important reason people chose antiX is:
Has a 70-90MB memory footprint.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Extremely lightweight
Has a 70-90MB memory footprint.
Pro Quick installation
The installation procedure for antiX is quick and painless. It installs the OS and grub in no time.
Pro Works well on 32-bit PC
Fewer distros are available to work on 32-bit machines. This works well on old Toshiba. Quick enough on older machines not to notice any lagging.
Pro Stats appear on the desktop
Pro Works very well on ASUS 1005HA netbook
Faster than other distros tested, including many on this list.
Pro Great Documentation
For the most part, documentation of ArchLinux can be applied to ArchLinux32.
Pro Arch User Repository
AUR still works here, and if package you desire still supports i386 architecture, you can have it on your installation.
Cons
Con Not really free and not available for download in Iran
Con Small communitry
Community behind ArchLinux32 is much smaller than behind ArchLinux. This makes problems occur more often, and solutions for those problems do take some time.
Con Had for non-patient people
Arch Linux 32, just like Arch Linux, requires careful studying documentation.
