When comparing Archbang vs Parrot GNU/Linux, the Slant community recommends Parrot GNU/Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best rolling release Linux distributions?” Parrot GNU/Linux is ranked 21st while Archbang is ranked 41st. The most important reason people chose Parrot GNU/Linux is:
It is compatible to Debian >=testing.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro The best features of Arch without the hassle
ArchBang is minimal but completely functional out of the box. It's still up to you to set up to your liking. You still get Arch's unmatched documentation, insanely vast number of packages (in AUR) and extreme customizability. And a small but friendly and approachable community.
Pro Rolling release
Being based on Arch, Archbang follows a rolling release schedule, ensuring that the software will always be on the bleeding edge.
Pro Lightweight
Archbang is a pretty lightweight distro. It uses Openbox as a Window Manager by default, without having the need to use a desktop environment which would only bloat the OS further.
Pro Compatible with Debian
It is compatible to Debian >=testing.
Pro Testing based
It is always based on the latest testing release so it includes more recent software than a stable based distribution.
Pro Focuses just one desktop
It focus the MATE desktop which makes it unique compared to the more general distros.