When comparing Archbang vs CloverOS, the Slant community recommends CloverOS for most people. In the question“What are the best rolling release Linux distributions?” CloverOS is ranked 11th while Archbang is ranked 41st. The most important reason people chose CloverOS is:
Minimal install to build upon.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro The best features of Arch without the hassle
ArchBang is minimal but completely functional out of the box. It's still up to you to set up to your liking. You still get Arch's unmatched documentation, insanely vast number of packages (in AUR) and extreme customizability. And a small but friendly and approachable community.
Pro Rolling release
Being based on Arch, Archbang follows a rolling release schedule, ensuring that the software will always be on the bleeding edge.
Pro Lightweight
Archbang is a pretty lightweight distro. It uses Openbox as a Window Manager by default, without having the need to use a desktop environment which would only bloat the OS further.
Pro Minimal
Minimal install to build upon.
Pro Fully Gentoo compatible
It is fully compatible to Gentoo.
Pro No UEFI support
If you use older computers and want neither UEFI nor systemd.
Cons
Con No UEFI support
If you have a system that can only boot EFI you are fu**ed!