Here’s the Deal

KiTTY vs Wterm

736 92

8 3

When comparing KiTTY vs Wterm, the Slant community recommends KiTTY for most people. In the question“What are the best terminal emulators for UNIX-like systems?” KiTTY is ranked 2nd while Wterm is ranked 28th. The most important reason people chose KiTTY is:

- Sessions filter - Shortcuts for pre-defined command - The session launcher - Automatic logon script - URL hyperlinks - Running a locally saved script on a remote session - Send to tray - Transparency - Quick start of a duplicate session - SSH Handler: Internet Explorer integration - pscp.exe and WinSCP integration - New command-line options

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best terminal emulators for UNIX-like systems?

Pros

Pro
Includes additional features over PuTTy

Sessions filter
Shortcuts for pre-defined command
The session launcher
Automatic logon script
URL hyperlinks
Running a locally saved script on a remote session
Send to tray
Transparency
Quick start of a duplicate session
SSH Handler: Internet Explorer integration
pscp.exe and WinSCP integration
New command-line options

Pro
Source Code Available

Source code is available so you could modify or review changes.

Pro
Startup sessions

Support start-up sessions which allow you to specify the window/tab layout, working directories, and programs to run on startup.

Pro
Can store login credentials

Ability to store passwords/passphrases locally.

Pro
Clickable URLs

URLs are parsed and can be clicked.

Pro
Auto login script

Automatic processing of commands after conncetion was made.

Pro
True Color support

Supports True Color, so software like Vim can display a really nice pallet.

Pro
Portable version available

Pro
Background image

Ability to overlay the terminal background with an image.

Pro
Unicode

Uses Unicode for the best character compatibility.

Pro
Fast

Wterm is very fast despite using very little memory.

Pro
Memory efficient

Each instance requires only about 6.3 MB of RAM, even with 10.000 lines of buffer.

Ad
Cons

Con
No centralized configuration

Each session holds its own configuration of all features. This means that if one wants to change a configuration common to all sessions (say, the terminal font), it has to be changed in each stored session separately.
A better solution would be to have a default configuration and store only the changed elements for each session (both configurations would be merged, with e priority on the specific one).