Find Awesome Games
Select the tags you're interested in to get a personalized feed of games and help others.
When comparing OpenFL vs Pixi.js, the Slant community recommends Pixi.js for most people. In the question“What are the best 2D game engines?” Pixi.js is ranked 56th while OpenFL is ranked 82nd. The most important reason people chose Pixi.js is:
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Specs
2DYes
3DYes
Desktop targetsMac; Windows; Linux
Dev platformsMac; Windows; Linux
Distributed targetsHTML5; WebGL; WebAssembly; Flash
LanguagesHaxe; JavaScript (via NPM); TypeScript (via NPM)
LicenseMIT
Mobile targetsiOS; Android
PriceFree
TV targetsApple TV
No specs yet!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
Pros
Pro Cross-platform
Web, desktop (win, osx, linux) and mobile (android, ios) targets are all supported at native speeds.
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Cons
Con Hasn't matured yet
OpenFL is a relatively young framework and unexpected behaviour can still be encountered.
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.