When comparing Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams vs The Effective Executive by Peter Drucker, the Slant community recommends Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams for most people. In the question“What are the best books on technical leadership in software projects?” Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams is ranked 2nd while The Effective Executive by Peter Drucker is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams is:
This book does not just discuss the technical aspects of leadership, but delves into human nature and communication.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Eloquently explains the sociological aspects of leadership
This book does not just discuss the technical aspects of leadership, but delves into human nature and communication.
Pro Very to the point writing style
The author has a clear and no-nonsense approach to teaching the different techniques discussed through the book.
Pro Covers everything from physical working arrangements to motivation techniques
Pro Catches most mistakes a new executive would make
Pro Examples span most of the last century, across cultures
These examples are old enough for us to see whether a decision regarded as brilliant is still brilliant or has it started to strangle the company (Drucker himself points out some cases, like GM's reorganization being brilliant for its time, but something which needs to change for it to move ahead).
Pro By the master of management, Peter F Drucker.
The author, Peter Drucker is sometimes referred to as "the founder of modern management".
He has 39 published books and was well known for his consulting work with management, working with large companies (such as IBM and General Motors).
Pro Entertaining writer
Pro Very thin
It's just 174 pages.
Cons
Con Quite repetitive
Much of the book is dedicated to getting the main point across (don't micromanage, let people do their job). This can make it feel repetitive and dull at times.
Con It's not specific to "technical leadership in software projects"
I.e. it does not answer the question specifically.
