BusterJS vs Mocha

No need to comment out your entire test case, now that you have Buster, which supports deferring a test so it doesn't actually run, but you get notified that there’s a deferred tests every time you run your test suite.

Have your test cases written in another framework, want to use BusterJS to run the tests, then you're in luck. BusterJS can be easily wrapped around other test frameworks. If you need to know how to do it, here's a link that showing just that.

Working on a NodeJS app? BusterJS can help you Unit test it. This pretty much works just like browser tests, but you need to require Buster.JS in your tests.

Don't have time to go through the lengthy process of opening up your browsers? BusterJS gives you the option of performing Headless tests. These are powered by PhantomJS; hence all your testing is done within the command line.

Mocha runs independently from the assertion library, so you can choose which assertion format works best for you.

Mocha most often is run in combination with assertion library Chai.

Allows developers to choose their development process. Not only TDD but also BDD.

Mocha has a browser build as well as a node command line program so you can test in client and server side environments.

No need to write tricky statements for Async testing. Mocha gives you a done callback. Place this done parameter in your callback function, that'll let Mocha know that you've written an asynchronous function.

The Mocha test framework itself runs on NodeJS, hence it makes everything related to it extremely simple. With Mocha's simple syntax and speed, testing your node.js app just got a whole lot easier.

Mocha has multiple test reporters built in and you can create your own as well. The test reporters have full color and makes it easy to see if your tests fail or not.

Aside from the numerous benefits with generators in your application, You can now also integrate generators into your test suite. By using mocha, all you have to do is enable support for generators.