Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing BusterJS vs CasperJS, the Slant community recommends CasperJS for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript unit testing tools?” CasperJS is ranked 3rd while BusterJS is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose CasperJS is:
There are times where you don't want to open up a browser for screencaps, that is where CasperJS comes to use, it can render the page using its own rendering engine and take and save a screenshot for you, all via the commandline
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports deferring tests
No need to comment out your entire test case, now that you have Buster, which supports deferring a test so it doesn't actually run, but you get notified that there’s a deferred tests every time you run your test suite.
Pro Flexible; extend it to wrap other test-frameworks
Have your test cases written in another framework, want to use BusterJS to run the tests, then you're in luck. BusterJS can be easily wrapped around other test frameworks. If you need to know how to do it, here's a link that showing just that.
Pro Has support for NodeJS testing.
Working on a NodeJS app? BusterJS can help you Unit test it. This pretty much works just like browser tests, but you need to require Buster.JS in your tests.
Pro You have the option of either running tests headless or via the browser
Don't have time to go through the lengthy process of opening up your browsers? BusterJS gives you the option of performing Headless tests. These are powered by PhantomJS; hence all your testing is done within the command line.
Pro Allows screenshots (either the full page or parts of it) if performing UI testing
There are times where you don't want to open up a browser for screencaps, that is where CasperJS comes to use, it can render the page using its own rendering engine and take and save a screenshot for you, all via the commandline
Pro Easy to understand
Pro Written in JavaScript
Since all webdevs know JS, the start-up time of learning the framework will be reduced to zero, as your team can be productive from day one.
Pro Easily integrates with other applications
Due to the simplicity of the framework, not only other libraries can be built with it, but it can be integrated with any web application as well.
Pro Can run javascript code inside pages being tested
Can execute arbitrary javascript or load external JS into the page being tested. This feature is possible due to the presence of a rendering engine, and helps you see the effects of any client side scripting during your tests.
Cons
Con Has no plugins for major IDE's (Eclipse/IntelliJ) yet.
Do you prefer running your test cases from inside your IDE? well BusterJS will make that a lot difficult for you if not impossible. You'll have to run Buster using the good old way of spawning up a new terminal for running the tests.
Con Currently still in Beta; some of the stuff still has bugs
Time of writing : 31st July 2014
Con Not for unit testing but rather UI testing
These are two extremely different concepts. CasperJS should be removed from this list
Con Cannot guarantee 100% accurate Webkit-based browser screenshots
QtWebKit is the rendering engine used by CasperJS. Keep in mind this is NOT the same rendering engine as Chrome; hence, if you want to be 100% sure of the results, you must run a Webkit browser (such as Chrome) yourself.
