When comparing Social Harvest vs quintly, the Slant community recommends Social Harvest for most people. In the question“What are the best social media dashboards?” Social Harvest is ranked 3rd while quintly is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Social Harvest is:
It's built in Go and takes advantage of concurrency allowing it to be quite fast. It can gather and analyze data quickly and efficiently using very little system resources.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast & efficient due to benefits provided by Go
It's built in Go and takes advantage of concurrency allowing it to be quite fast. It can gather and analyze data quickly and efficiently using very little system resources.
Pro Flexible data storage & workflow
It stores data to several databases natively (including Postgres which is then of course available on Amazon RDS and RedShift, etc.), but also logs out to file on disk. These files can then be picked up by something like Fluentd and then sent literally anywhere. This allows Social Harvest to fit any work flow and act as a stand alone data harvester (without the dashboard part).
Pro It's free and open source
It's free, open source software allowing it to be modified to fit specific needs. It's licensed under GPL v3 with code available on GitHub.
Pro Tailored reporting
Allows you to automate the reporting of your social media analysis. You can set up whitelabeled templates and create custom reports.
Pro Centralizes analytics from a variety of social networks
Quintly pulls KPIs from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn, Instagram as well as blogs.
Pro Competitive benchmarking
Allows you to compare your KPIs against competitor KPIs.
Pro Quick setup
Can get you up and running in less than 2 minutes.
Cons
Con Not user friendly yet
Installation is a pain.
Con Has not been updated since 2016
Latest commit on its Github page is from 2016.