When comparing ShiVa vs Torque3D, the Slant community recommends Torque3D for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D game engines?” Torque3D is ranked 25th while ShiVa is ranked 35th. The most important reason people chose Torque3D is:
Torque3D is a free game engine licensed under MIT with source code available on [GitHub](https://github.com/GarageGames/Torque3D).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Straightforward pricing with capable free option
The free ShiVa Web version is limited to web publication, but otherwise has the same capabilities as the $200 ShiVa Basic. Upgrading to the $1000 ShiVa Advanced brings tools geared toward team development and professional releases, such as integrated SVN support and profiling tools. All versions are royalty-free.
Pro Lua can be used for fast coding and C++ for optimization
All game logic can be scripted in Lua. ShiVa also provides a cross-compiler from Lua to C++, allowing Lua scripts to be further optimized and compiled to native code for performance.
Pro Great support
In addition to the help forum, Basic and Advanced licensees have chat and direct email access to the developers.
Pro Native c++ export
Pro C++ plugin development options
Pro Great performance on mobile
Smaller platform specific executables, native code export, good FPS even for complex scenes. ShiVa has great advanced optimization features, including PVS and LOD, decreasing number of drawcalls even in complex level. Platform specific profiles allow developers to customize size and compression level for textures and test those settings directly in editor. Other engine features, like lightning baking, mesh combining and GPU skinning will boost performance too.
Pro Free and open source
Torque3D is a free game engine licensed under MIT with source code available on GitHub.
Pro Incredible Performance on low-end PCs
Even on low-end-PCs the Engine and its games run perfect.
Pro Many stock features for a FPS but flexible enough for other Genres
Pro Continually updated by a dedicated and skilled community
Pro Easy to implement 32 to 64 multi-player networking
Torque's approach to networking makes this one of the best performing and easiest to implement multiplayer game engines available.
Pro Redistributable tools
Cons
Con ShiVa 2.0 has been worked on for nearly 4 years!
After 4 years of development and promises ShiVa 2.0 has JUST gotten into beta access.
Con Outdated
The current version 1.9.2 of ShiVa was released in December 2013. While there is active development on version 2.0, its beta is available only to paid licensees of the current version.
Con High Cost
Costs $200 for the basic version alone, which allows you to publish to any format other than web. The Team/Pro version costs $1000
Con Aging
If you are planing on using some of the latest graphical options, pick another engine.
Con Weak AI
Movement AI is limited to moving in a straight line.
Con Limited platforms
Torque3D only publishes to desktop and mobile.