When comparing Torque3D vs Crystal Space 3D, the Slant community recommends Torque3D for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D game engines?” Torque3D is ranked 15th while Crystal Space 3D is ranked 40th. The most important reason people chose Torque3D is:
Torque3D is a free game engine licensed under MIT with source code available on [GitHub](https://github.com/GarageGames/Torque3D).
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Free and open source
Torque3D is a free game engine licensed under MIT with source code available on GitHub.
Pro Many stock features for a FPS but flexible enough for other Genres
Pro Continually updated by a dedicated and skilled community
Pro Incredible Performance on low-end PCs
Even on low-end-PCs the Engine and its games run perfect
Pro Easy to implement 32 to 64 multi-player networking
Torque's approach to networking makes this one of the best performing and easiest to implement multiplayer game engines available.
Pro Redistributable tools
Pro Scripting language bindings (via swig) python, perl, tcl
Scripting language biddings are available via swig, supposedly any swig target could be used If you are okay with building, and probably maintaining, the project for your own needs then you may be able to build bindings for your favorite scripting platform.
As noted in a slant "con", there are no binary releases, including no prebuilt bindings.
Pro Cross platform
Runs on all major desktop platforms.
Con Limited platforms
torque3D only publishes to web.
Con Weak AI
Movement AI is limited to moving in a straight line.
If you are planing on using some of the latest graphical options, pick another engine.
Con No binary releases.
Expect to compile this from source if your want to play with it.
Ubuntu has a package for it, but that package appears to be missing it's scripting language bindings. I expect the build is also quite old and i fear may be dropped in coming Ubuntu releases.