When comparing Galaxy vs Pure CSS from Yahoo!, the Slant community recommends Pure CSS from Yahoo! for most people. In the question“What is the best CSS framework?” Pure CSS from Yahoo! is ranked 15th while Galaxy is ranked 43rd. The most important reason people chose Pure CSS from Yahoo! is:
Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast and lightweight
Galaxy uses CSS animations and rarely relies on Javascript (2kb). It's about 1/67th the size of Bootstrap.
Pro Beautiful
More modern UI than traditional frameworks like Bootstrap.
Pro Semantic markup
Using the custom attribute g, it's very easy to scale and maintain.
Pro Easy to customize
Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.
Pro Cross-Browser compatibility
A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues.
Pro Lightweight
Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip.
Pro Responsive
A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs.
Pro Works well with Bootstrap
Easily use Bootstrap CSS and JS elements within the framework.
Cons
Con Not suitable for beginners
Since Pure CSS only carries a minimum number of styles out of the box, it might not be great for beginners who want a complete style that looks good out of the box without having to customize it.