When comparing Semantic UI vs ArtDesignUI, the Slant community recommends Semantic UI for most people. In the question“What are the best Bootstrap alternatives?” Semantic UI is ranked 1st while ArtDesignUI is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Semantic UI is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Load only the components you need
Pro The elements offer a huge amount of customization, far beyond a framework like bootstrap.
Pro It's semantic
Uses semantic class names for its styling, making it easier to grasp and understand even for beginners looking to jump right in.
Pro Beautifully designed
Semantic UI has a futuristic and beautiful design. Many will satisfied with the design, especially when Semantic UI is used as a CSS framework.
Pro It'll have almost any UI component/element you may think of for your project
It includes tons of UI components that you may need for almost any type of project you may work on; And of course, you can always only pick what you need.
Pro Well documented
The documentation is easy to use, well written and has lots of examples each with their source codes.
Pro Easy to use
Pro Support for all major web browsers
This includes IE 7 and its newer versions.
Pro Great technical support available
The ArtDesignUI team offers great technical support to users.
Pro Fully responsive
Pro Class prefix to prevent conflict with classes from other CSS files
Pro Full style control with JS
No need for CSS: width, height, border, icons, colors, etc...
Pro Variety of transition effects
Pro Full control of the position of all elements
Pro Support images with different dimensions
Pro Keys press listening and mouse wheel listening
Pro Full navigation control
Con Very large file size
Packages are much bigger when comparing to Twitter Bootstrap or Zurb Foundation. Semantic UI is really extremely large and it would be better to use specific modules and components, rather than the whole thing.
Contains a lot of UI inaccuracies, like wrong positioning, cannot mix classes, etc.
Con Small number of classes
Once you wanna do something that is not mentioned in the doc - prepare to spend an hour, then give up and implement a custom "workaround".
Con Looks terrible
Con Pushes some really awful ideas
Loading splash screens, non-changing URLs because everything's loaded by JS, awful HTML generation from the PHP scripts. It's just a trash fire of bad.
Con Costs €50 - €250
And that's just a year of updates.