Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Material UI vs Pure CSS from Yahoo!, the Slant community recommends Material UI for most people. In the question“What is the best CSS framework?” Material UI is ranked 8th while Pure CSS from Yahoo! is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Material UI is:
Really nice implementation so far
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Adheres really well to the material design standard
Really nice implementation so far
Pro Perfect for React projects
Really convenient and easy to use components
Pro Easy to customize
Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.
Pro Cross-Browser compatibility
A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues.
Pro Lightweight
Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip.
Pro Responsive
A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs.
Pro Works well with Bootstrap
Easily use Bootstrap CSS and JS elements within the framework.
Cons
Con Active development means API changes are frequent
Might be a problem for large projects, but since active development is a good thing, you should consider this rather mild inconvenience weighed against the benefits.
Con Not suitable for beginners
Since Pure CSS only carries a minimum number of styles out of the box, it might not be great for beginners who want a complete style that looks good out of the box without having to customize it.
