Chatlink.com vs Element (formerly Riot)

Because the encryption keys are generated in client browser and never sent to the server.

All this encryption takes place at client side, so that even the server administrators have no access to the data.

But creating an account can be useful, too: while having an account the key exchange can be done through public key cryptography.

It does not save any cookies or have any external links (like Google Adwords for example) that could track you.

The source code is available here. Being open source allows anyone to audit the code.

You're not confined within Element's or even Matrix garden, and you don't have to make users of other networks switch to Matrix.

Code snippets in chats can be highlighted with Markdown.

Element has a very simple interface, adding the ability for more inexperienced users to use it.

Element allows for fully encrypted text, voice, and video chatting.

Want to watch that flick at YouTube and discuss it at the same time? Have Grafana graphs stacked above your DevOps team chat? Collaboratively edit Google Docs and chat over without switching applications? This is possible with Element.

An open network for secure, decentralized communication.

Search messages in your current room, or all the rooms you're in. Not subject to a message history limit like Slack.

Web browser
Linux
OS X
Windows
Android
iOS

With public rooms for many people, and you can create your own and let people from the community join.

An easy to activate integration that allows multiple authors to edit a document simultaneously.