When comparing FireCMD vs Fluent Terminal, the Slant community recommends Fluent Terminal for most people. In the question“What are the best terminal emulators for Windows?” Fluent Terminal is ranked 19th while FireCMD is ranked 21st. The most important reason people chose Fluent Terminal is:
Supports different shells, such as Cmder's clink and powershell.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Sophisticated auto-completion
FireCMD supports command auto-completion. Once you start typing a command, you can press the tab
key to auto-complete it.
Pro Recursive and persistent aliases
FireCMD allows users to create up to 500 aliases.
Pro HTML and CSS support makes for greater usability
HTML is a very flexible and user-friendly language for writing web pages, while CSS allows for the content of a HTML document to be separated from the style and layout of that document.
Pro A free trial is available
A free trial of FireCMD is available for users to try out.
Pro Integration for Cmder and Powershell
Supports different shells, such as Cmder's clink and powershell.
Pro Great looks
Support Microsoft Fluent Design's Acrylic effect for a blurred-behind effect on Windows.
Pro Fast and modern design
Pro Fast
Pro Nice design
Great customized terminal but needs lot of other basic features too like scrollbar.
Cons
Con Not free
Although there's a free trial available, FireCDM is not free and costs $29.
Con No Scrollbars
Without scrollbar it is very difficult to navigate even the default Microsoft Terminal has a good scrollbar