Komodo Edit vs Coda
When comparing Komodo Edit vs Coda, the Slant community recommends Coda for most people. In the question“What are the best programming text editors for a Mac with a GUI?” Coda is ranked 14th while Komodo Edit is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose Coda is:
Publishing your changes to the web server is a one-click operation. That is, one click per file, or one click for all your changed files. Or even cherry-pick the files to be published in the next batch.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Has built-in FTP
Komodo Edit has a built-in FTP client which allows developers to access remotely hosted files.
Pro Free and open-source
Komodo Edit is the free and open-source counterpart of Komodo IDE.
Pro Vim support
Komodo Edit has support for a limited Vim mode.
Pro Built-in FTP client
Publishing your changes to the web server is a one-click operation. That is, one click per file, or one click for all your changed files. Or even cherry-pick the files to be published in the next batch.
Pro Built-in support for Git and Subversion
Although the software doesn't ship with these libraries, it does work once you have one installed.
Pro Live Preview mode
Makes styling a site in CSS simpler.
Pro Mature
Coda has been developed by Panic exclusively for Mac since 2007. The experience of the developers shows in the stability and polish of their product.
Pro Many plugins available
There is a huge library of user-created plugins, ranging from additional syntax modes, to code validation and beautification, to reference materials, code snippets, text actions and more.
Cons
Con Not very lightweight
Komodo Edit is not very lightweight and that can slow it down during startup.
Con Adds project files to project code
Con Expensive
The price of $99 is more than many other editors.