When comparing avast! vs Panda Antivirus for Mac, the Slant community recommends avast! for most people. In the question“What is the best antivirus software for the Mac OS?” avast! is ranked 3rd while Panda Antivirus for Mac is ranked 7th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Decent anti-virus protection
Pro Scans IOS devices
Explicitly states that it scans IOS devices on the tin out of the box with little to no modifications of settings.
Con Tries too hard to sell you the paid version
Con Too noisy
Avast! has sounds turned on by default. It also has a lot of blinky features of questionable use.
Con Makes your system slower than usual
Even though scans are not being run in background, it will slow your system.
Con Opt-out installation of Google Chrome
These advertising tactics are simply unacceptable
Con Selling potentially identifying user data
Con Detection rate isn't too solid
Avast! is not the sort of antivirus product to give you peace of mind. In practice, it does miss some malware every now and then. You'll need backup virus protection, which raises the question why you should get Avast in the first place.
Con Expires after a year leaving computer exposed to new viruses
Expires and stops updating after a year after which the user's computer may become infected by new viruses not covered by existing patterns.
Con may interferes with hyper-V
since avast has its own virtualization engine, it will cause issues with hyper-V
Con Unable to detect some adware such as FADE adware
Con block or cause issues on apps or games
Con "Smart Screen" feature
When running an unknown application, avast will run it wrapped in a sandbox environment first for scanning, then kill the process and re-run it again. A lot of applications do not like this.
Con Lacking in features compared to competing products
Does not include anti phishing features like competing products do.
Con Expensive annual subscription plan
Pretty expensive at the time of this writing February 5th 2016 a single annual license goes for $54.99 USD.